Legal engineers started the Internet as well as blockchain arguably, so I think we'll see huge impact if the community focuses on nurturing this fledgling but often overlooked or suppressed profession: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Goldfarb (RIP) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Szabo respectively.

How LexDAO supports Zuzalu's mission: "Our mission is to build technologies that enrich human communication and cooperation for a networked society that bridges cooperation across differences." https://zuzalu.network/faq . This mission to me describes sans technology what prosocial lawyers do well as facilitators. With technology included, that's what legal engineers do well. Jurisprudence has been wrestling with Zuzalu's mission at the most fundamental/hard levels (including breakdown in cooperation as extreme as crimes against humanity!) since before time immemorial (legal provenance before/after Richard I). To me, Occam's Razor is to get lawyers literate in computational languages and include public legal education in good civics (LexDAO's goals), rather than get developers to practice law without a license or supervision (status quo). 

Did LexDAO visit Zuzalu 1.0? No we didn't. Many of our friends went and my family lives in Kotor so I definitely felt FOMO. Had to budget and prioritized Prospera since I was co-hosting with Niklas Anzinger (who's also heavily involved with Zuzalu). 

Are the things you're making open source? Yes, this is the point. Open sourcing the law in general not just computational law, which is an uphill battle given how much the legal community can charge in an almost exclusively closed source environment. Fear tactics include threat of malpractice and unlicensed practice of law punishment. I believe open law is more important than any other transparency fight, because law affects all other sectors including finance.