Our proposed approach to developing a maturity framework includes evaluating the current state of the grant program, including its structure, processes, and objectives. We will conduct quantitative comparisons across different programs to determine which grant programs are funding which types of projects. Once the characteristics of each grant program are identified, we will extract key elements. For instance, contributions to Uniswap might be strongly related to how well they support the Uniswap ecosystem, while for Gitcoin, a more neutral protocol might be crucial. At this stage, we will clarify the level of contribution to Uniswap and the degree of neutrality for Gitcoin. 

Based on the extracted elements, we will score applied projects to allocate funding. This approach aims to clarify the role of each grant program and ensure that funding is directed towards projects that align with the program's focus, thereby increasing efficiency. We envision creating a database to facilitate this analysis.

Additionally, we will provide recommendations for improvement and continuously track progress. We also foresee the possibility of operating a grant program that funds projects deemed subjectively important but not widely supported, ensuring that essential projects receive necessary funding.