{"signature": "0x7d674151d15bf21148c0132c649ce0ec671f6182b7556f4c69efb241c6d5fbe80847da9b43efaadb6d59bf2df1d5cba438f8f8cb6d097fa9ecf05ab2642273821c", "application": {"round": "0xb91b59c91b09d127d269e53019f2420e8c2c7ce7", "answers": [{"type": "email", "hidden": true, "question": "Email Address", "questionId": 0, "encryptedAnswer": {"ciphertext": "CnmgZB7lsKT9GIHNdGNvq3UiTsaP/GZZEFOpUjJidtw=", "encryptedSymmetricKey": "60b426db32913f4f30478824ddc49752ca76b093635feac9742500cf1ef0b78efc47c32a68a64cd10220cfd026b370033114bd986c50a2da5e849752236d57c376e17e2183297617c3b73f0620218e8e2de9c9a2f82cf8e6ff99cdb271fdbfb95dd72ecb3b0b033290f82fd34cfa35293cf67d442276df7d6d3210cc9d5df13d0000000000000020e5da61c8ce46e8db6fc6a7a4c1b3f541564b013d9eadbb36a9ff52f2d36c3e58c1431325c1228830592b9b58dc840780"}}, {"type": "short-answer", "answer": "@volky_eth", "hidden": true, "question": "Telegram Handle", "questionId": 1}, {"type": "short-answer", "answer": "https://github.com/network-goods-institute/negation-game", "hidden": true, "question": "Project GitHub Repo", "questionId": 2}, {"type": "short-answer", "hidden": true, "question": "Link to your Public Group Chat", "questionId": 3}, {"type": "short-answer", "hidden": true, "question": "Have you participated in a previous Gitcoin Grants Round? If so, please name the rounds or link the builder profile associated with previous rounds.", "questionId": 4}, {"type": "paragraph", "answer": "We're building a new mechanism for decentralized governance, and later on for funding allocation and financial support of public goods (like OSS)", "hidden": true, "question": "How does your project contribute to the growth of the OSS ecosystem? Please provide specific examples of how your application enhances or expands the current ecosystem.", "questionId": 5}, {"type": "paragraph", "answer": "It's a discussion platform unlike Discourse, Discord or the other usual ones, in which participants can debate using a graph structure, and stake/place bets on the ideas they believe in.", "hidden": true, "question": "What features or use cases does your dApp/App present? How is it differentiated?", "questionId": 6}, {"type": "paragraph", "answer": "We're setting up experiments with DAOs in a low-stakes setup, as a temp check, and will try out the system in progressively more adversarial contexts as we make the mechanism set more robust.", "hidden": true, "question": "What are your plans for further development, and how will the grant funds be used to achieve these goals?", "questionId": 7}, {"type": "paragraph", "hidden": true, "question": "For any project deploying smart contracts on blockchain networks, please list all your deployer addresses and their corresponding blockchain networks. Use this format for each entry: [deployer_address], [chain_id]\u2014for example, 0x123abc..., 42161 (This represents a deployer address on the Arbitrum network). Please include a separate line for each unique deployer address and blockchain combination.", "questionId": 8}], "project": {"id": "0x6e16d24eeb40a1f4ec009f1755f38598e5c13ed79e2aacb30f08062d95eb24a5", "title": "Negation Game", "logoImg": "bafkreib4upcddnqlf7ugoixxflww3tcplms2smqz3flxtrbuxbzfbhpney", "metaPtr": {"pointer": "bafkreihv6bgaehao4h2t52rzbwb5so7ramxqromq7pxb2y56zp47k6mlju", "protocol": "undefined"}, "website": "https://negationgame.com", "bannerImg": "bafkreidb3byyplv3t2gohdrgjiymcm5mx3tnuil73rbqwsbgccynkpttfa", "createdAt": 1729716885413, "userGithub": "volkyeth", "credentials": {"github": {"type": ["VerifiableCredential"], "proof": {"jws": "eyJhbGciOiJFZERTQSIsImNyaXQiOlsiYjY0Il0sImI2NCI6ZmFsc2V9..4rR0TVlp9N4ZRtzSeYCFHvr0nWzj-POXCqX8mdK3cBpael0x1BCVUZrW9vLQsLlknk5SRIu0ZMrvkOHM0i_CBw", "type": "Ed25519Signature2018", "created": "2024-10-23T20:54:19.299Z", "proofPurpose": "assertionMethod", "verificationMethod": "did:key:z6MkghvGHLobLEdj1bgRLhS4LPGJAvbMA1tn2zcRyqmYU5LC#z6MkghvGHLobLEdj1bgRLhS4LPGJAvbMA1tn2zcRyqmYU5LC"}, "issuer": "did:key:z6MkghvGHLobLEdj1bgRLhS4LPGJAvbMA1tn2zcRyqmYU5LC", "@context": ["https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1"], "issuanceDate": "2024-10-23T20:54:19.299Z", "expirationDate": "2025-01-21T20:54:19.299Z", "credentialSubject": {"id": "did:pkh:eip155:1:0x6a024f521f83906671e1a23a8B6c560be7e980F4", "hash": "v0.0.0:ydZ11T+XyaygsngZO9ENm0Vr4fTaR/CPEzriVb099ms=", "@context": [{"hash": "https://schema.org/Text", "provider": "https://schema.org/Text"}], "provider": "ClearTextGithubOrg#network-goods-institute#847070"}}, "twitter": {"type": ["VerifiableCredential"], "proof": {"jws": "eyJhbGciOiJFZERTQSIsImNyaXQiOlsiYjY0Il0sImI2NCI6ZmFsc2V9..EHAdMJFDcMjXFSloamjc7O369QDQH-CaOX8vpaniqGukvaCmj3Tr3jhKEGgf3L9hAr_NwL6NQejZB9MtokYhAg", "type": "Ed25519Signature2018", "created": "2024-10-23T21:52:46.417Z", "proofPurpose": "assertionMethod", "verificationMethod": "did:key:z6MkghvGHLobLEdj1bgRLhS4LPGJAvbMA1tn2zcRyqmYU5LC#z6MkghvGHLobLEdj1bgRLhS4LPGJAvbMA1tn2zcRyqmYU5LC"}, "issuer": "did:key:z6MkghvGHLobLEdj1bgRLhS4LPGJAvbMA1tn2zcRyqmYU5LC", "@context": ["https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1"], "issuanceDate": "2024-10-23T21:52:46.417Z", "expirationDate": "2025-01-21T21:52:46.417Z", "credentialSubject": {"id": "did:pkh:eip155:1:0x6a024f521f83906671e1a23a8B6c560be7e980F4", "hash": "v0.0.0:U5+0oXC0BPc8ljwOSwpUM2h1UiJ9m3EGl3B6Cdis7I8=", "@context": [{"hash": "https://schema.org/Text", "provider": "https://schema.org/Text"}], "provider": "ClearTextTwitter#NegationGame"}}}, "description": "# Negation Game\n\nThe Negation Game is a new kind of large-group **decision-making tool** for DAOs that favors **sound arguments and objective knowledge**, favoring contributors when they are internally consistent, epistemically humble, and capable of changing their mind.\n\nDAOs can use the Negation Game to do a temperature check on a proposal, as an alternative for platforms like Discord, Discourse and social media. It allows the community to **quantify their collective conviction** in ideas, and puts arguments to the test by allowing participants to question them from multiple angles, and by **focusing attention on the most important ideas**. \n\n## How does it work?\n\nOne thing that makes the Negation Game different from existing sense-making platforms is that **the discussion takes place in a graph** structure instead of in a linear or threaded form.\n![image](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/SykAXT8xkl.png)\n\nThe main benefit of this format is that all **arguments are consolidated** and the collective conviction in each of them is quantified, which allows it to **inform the decision in a game-theoretically sound way**. Another important one is that, instead of eliciting a binary YES/NO answer from the community, the rationale behind every disagreement is mapped out, and all **the nuances of the discussion are exposed**.\n\n\nThe main innovation in the Negation Game that allows for this is called **Epistemic Leverage**: It gives additional influence to participants when declare how they could be wrong, or how they could change their mind. This is the principle underlying good Science: **a theory is only scientific if it's falsifiable**. \n\nBy stating \u201cthis would change my mind\u201d, DAO members also help map out experiments to run, questions to answer, data to collect, and obstacles to avoid. This approach encourages **productive dissent** by highlighting actionable next steps that **move the conversation forward**.\n\n## What's the current state of the project?\n\nWe're currently running the first prototype of the Negation Game at negationgame.com. This version was built on top of the [Farcaster protocol](https://www.farcaster.xyz/), and although it helps map out the discussion, it still does not implement the mechanism of Epistemic Leverage.\n\nWe're building **the next version** of it right now, which will bring about several improvements based on our learnings from running the prototype. Aside from offering a mobile-first **improved UX**, we'll incorporate **AI features** to help enrich the discussion and to evaluate the results.\n\n![image](https://hackmd.io/_uploads/SkdOaT8eyg.png)\n\n\n## What's on the roadmap?\n\nTo begin with, we'll soon be announcing some **early-stage experiments with DAOs**. We want to put the system to the test, starting out in low-stakes environments, and then iterating under **progressively more adversarial contexts** as we make the game rules more robust.\n\nIn the longer term, our ambition is to develop it into a **full-fledged governance system**, which we'll call **Epistocracy**.\n\nIf we're successful, we've not only created a better governance layer for DAOs, but also a **new kind of capital allocation mechanism**: one that enables **investing in ideas** and profitably funding of exploratory science at scale.\n\n\n## Who are you?\n\n- Connor McCormick [Twitter(\ud835\udd4f)](https://twitter.com/connormcmk)/[Farcaster](https://warpcast.com/nor)\n- Volky [Twitter(\ud835\udd4f)](https://twitter.com/volkyeth)/[Farcaster](https://warpcast.com/volky.eth)\n\n## I want to contribute\n\nIf you're interested in participating in upcoming experiments or potentially running your own, please get in touch with Connor on Twitter (https://twitter.com/connormcmk) or Warpcast (https://warpcast.com/nor)", "lastUpdated": 0, "projectGithub": "network-goods-institute", "projectTwitter": "NegationGame"}, "recipient": "0x6a024f521f83906671e1a23a8B6c560be7e980F4"}}